REFERENCES
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: All You Wanted To Know About Fluoride Varnish, But Were Afraid To Ask!
10 SepABC, 123, I mean A1C?
14 Aug- Look for providers billing this upwards of 6 or more times per year
- Look for diagnoses that don’t correspond to diabetes related symptoms
- Look for excessive units per date of service
- Review medical records to determine if tests are repeated after normal results
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: Let’s Talk About Modifier JW!
26 JunLet’s refresh our memories on what modifiers are and what they do. Modifiers are extra characters that may be letters, numbers or both that are appended to either a CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) or HCPCS (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System) Code. Modifiers provide additional information about equipment, service, procedure, and/or condition of a patient. Some modifiers may also have an impact on reimbursement.
According to CMS, This modifier should not be used for[2]:
- drugs or biologicals administered in a Rural Health Clinic (RHC) or a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC).
- claims for hospital inpatient admissions that are billed under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System
- drugs or biologicals from multi-dose or multi-use packages
It is important to check your respective plan policies and guidelines. However, it is recommended to look for providers billing for this modifier excessively and for the average number of units higher per patient than other providers. Keep in mind, many dosage amounts for drugs or biologicals are based on various guidelines including the patient’s weight and diagnosis. The dosage amount used and the amount discard should be documented in the medical record (compounding record). Therefore, if the dosage amount is based on a patient’s weight one could calculate the appropriate drug amount based on the information in the medical records. This information would include the physician’s order, patient’s weight and medically necessity of the treatment.
Healthcare Fraud Shield Latest Article: Are You Seeing an Increase in Digital Medicine Billing?
19 Mar![](https://mlsvc01-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/bcad2607201/fd14d934-f081-4535-b596-1ca70d1cdd78.png)
- Both codes are time-based so look for excessive time billed in a day
- Look for frequency of codes billed per patient, per provider
- Look for services billed separately that would be considered included. For example, according to Medicare CCI, CPT 99358 and 99359 (prolonged services without face to face contact) would not be allowed with 99451.
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: Developmental Testing Code Changes
5 JanHappy New Year! With a New Year comes new codes, coding changes and of course coding challenges. This article will focus specifically on the changes made to developmental testing. In February 2018, Healthcare Fraud Shield wrote an article about the differences between Current Procedural Terminology Code (CPT) 96110 and 96111[1]. CPT 96111 was deleted; however, CPT 96110 remains.
2018 Codes and Descriptions
96110: Developmental screening (e.g., developmental milestone survey, speech and language delay screen), with scoring and documentation, per standardized instrument
96111: Developmental testing, (includes assessment of motor, language, social, adaptive, and/or cognitive functioning by standardized developmental instruments) with interpretation and report.
2019 Codes and Descriptions
As mentioned above, CPT 96110 remains an active code for 2019. Additionally, two new codes were added:
96112: Developmental test administration (including assessment of fine and/or gross motor, language, cognitive level, social, memory and/or executive functions by standardized developmental instruments when performed), by physician or other qualified health care professional, with interpretation and report; first hour
+96113: Developmental test administration (including assessment of fine and/or gross motor, language, cognitive level, social, memory and/or executive functions by standardized developmental instruments when performed), by physician or other qualified health care professional, with interpretation and report; each additional 30 minutes (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
What is Developmental Testing?
It used to diagnosis developmental problems among children. For example, according to the AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics), CPT 96111 including tests such as the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Third Edition).[2] This test is used to “identify possible developmental delay, inform professionals about specific areas of strength or weakness when planning a comprehensive intervention, and provide a method of monitoring a child’s developmental progress.”[3]
What to look for?
- Since the new codes are time based, look for providers billing excessive time per patient, per day across all patients, and/or excessive units of the add-on code (96113).
- Look for bundled services. Evaluation and management codes can be billed along with developmental testing codes as long as the services are separate and distinct.
If you have general SIU questions or comments, please contact us at SIU@hcfraudshield.com.
REFERENCES
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: Vitamin D Deficiency
14 Nov
- 82306 Vitamin D; 25 hydroxy, includes fraction(s), if performed
- 82652 Vitamin D; 1,25 dihydroxy, includes fraction(s), if performed
- 0038U Vitamin D, 25 hydroxy D2 and D3, by LC-MS/MS, serum microsample, quantitative
- Identify providers billing this code excessively compared to their peers
- Look for providers billing the code multiple times per patient
- Review patient diagnoses to determine if medically necessary
- Look for providers billing the same diagnosis code (vitamin D deficiency) for every patient
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: Don’t Get Sick from Flu Codes
27 Aug- 87502: Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA); influenza virus, for multiple types or sub-types, includes multiplex reverse transcription, when performed, and multiplex amplified probe technique, first 2 types or sub-types[2]
- 87804: Infectious agent antigen detection byimmunoassay with direct optical observation; Influenza[3]
- When were tests performed? Did they occur during flu season?
- Did patients receive BOTH DNA/RNA and RDIT tests within the same time frame? What order?
- Did many/most patients receive testing?
- Did most patients receive the DNA/RNA? What was the clinical rationale?
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: Medical Evaluation and Management Codes Billed by Dentists
11 Jun- Excessive comprehensive evaluations
- Excessive medical E/M codes compared to peers
- Excessive high level medical E/M codes
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: Don’t Feel the Pressure of Wound Therapy Billing
10 MayNegative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is a technique used to aid healing of burns, acute and chronic wounds to include, without limitation, diabetic wounds, pressure wounds, surgical wounds and burns. In negative pressure wound therapy, the provider uses an electrical pump to apply controlled subatmospheric pressure through a sealed dressing, which creates a vacuum around the wound to remove fluids and infectious materials and to promote healing.
Considerations
There are many considerations that vary from payer to payer. Many payers will have specific medical policies governing when NPWT would be acceptable, what interventions should be attempted prior to NPWT and what requirements are necessary to support ongoing therapy.
In many cases, ongoing therapy will need to demonstrate that the therapy is efficacious. This typically requires that the treating provider perform or supervise dressing changes, and report on the wound size and characteristics.
How is it billed?
It is billed using HCPCS (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System) Code E2402: Negative pressure wound therapy electrical pump, stationary or portable.This code covers the supply of an electric pump used to provide negative pressure wound therapy.
What to look for
One of the most common red flags concerns how long the patient is using NPWT. A patient that extends beyond four (4) months of NPWT, may be worth additional review. This will be especially true if the provider has a pattern of a disproportionately high number of patients being billed for atypically long periods (4+ months).
Some Behaviors and KPIs to Examine
1) Frequency: How long is the course of NPWT?
2) Density: What percentage of patients have atypically long durations of NPWT?
3) Connectivity: What other services and/or conditions does the patient have? Prior to NPWT? Concurrent with NPWT?
If you have general SIU questions or comments, please contact us at SIU@hcfraudshield.com.
If you would like to learn more about Healthcare Fraud Shield’s analytics solution, contact us at info@hcfraudshield.com.
Healthcare Fraud Shield’s Latest Article: Developing a Method to Uncover Abnormal Billing Behavior
9 AprAs with past articles from Healthcare Fraud Shield, future articles will focus on specific schemes to look for, where we will examine specific schemes or issues supported by precise codes, be they procedures, diagnoses, modifiers, or DRGs (Diagnosis Related Groups) associated with high risk behaviors.
However, in this article, we want to take a step back and discuss methodologies to analyze data, so that any behavior, known, or not, will raise to the surface, and predicate additional review. In many future articles, we will relate many of these concepts to methods to uncover the specific schemes discussed.
Developing a Methodology
One of the best ways to uncover “outliers” is to first understand the areas of risk. Think about your successful cases, or recent cases in the news. What common threads did they have? Once you isolate on these “macro” level behaviors, you can begin to look for them, wherever they may hide.
You should develop a method that accounts for the major behaviors you identified. Going through your cases like a checklist is one way to begin to formulate your behavior list. Keep in mind the behavior list is not the list of allegations, it is more the why behind it. For example, what is upcoding? Billing for a higher level of service than what was provided. How/why does that happen? Many factors can impact the degree to which a service is potentially up codded. Some of these include, specialty, condition, and even geography. Your method should answer the why and the how.
One approach you may consider is the below Suspect Behavior Profile When you examine your cases, you will probably find that many of those cases exhibited one or more of the following behaviors driving the scheme. This is just one approach, feel free to use this as a springboard, add to it, subtract from it, make it work for you.
Frequency
Something is happening too frequently. Most commonly, it could be repeat visits, but it can be more hidden, such as suspicious duplication of procedures over time.
Density
Density looks at how clustered or concentrated behaviors are. For example, a very simple density issue is too many patients in a day. However, as another example, it could look at things such as abnormal numbers of patients from a specific employer group.
Intensity
Intensity is analogous to the upcoding mentioned above. On the simple side, it can be procedural upcoding, billing a higher level of service within a group of related procedures. It can also include examples that include a modifier, or diagnosis that is added to a claim (think DRG) that increases the payment.
Velocity
Velocity measures the degree to which a behavior is increasing or decreasing. “Spike” detection often considers only positive changes, but abnormal negative changes can be just as enlightening. Change detection methodology is important to uncover spikes and dips within payments, patient volume and services.
Connectivity
The last of the five (5) behaviors in the profile is connectivity. This looks at relationships between attributes. For example, we often hear of “link analysis” which identifies relationships between provider and patients. However, in addition, and often overlooked, there are “connections” between many other attributes. Examples could include procedure to procedure, procedure to gender, procedure to specialty, etc.
Take Away
- Dissect some of your prior cases and think about the behaviors that manifested as potential suspicious behaviors you would like to detect in a more strategic approach
- Develop specific KPIs for each of those behaviors. Some examples include:
- Frequency: Visits/Patient
- Density: % of Patients
- Intensity: Average Level of Service
- Velocity: % Increase
- Connectivity: % of Total
- Look for outliers at the provider, procedure and diagnosis level for those KPIs. That could be indication of issues that require additional review
- Conduct additional review, and validate/refine the KPIs that are working best
You must be logged in to post a comment.